PRIORITAS PENGANGKUTAN KOMODITAS KARGO UMUM DI DIVISI EKSPOR PENGANGKUTAN UDARA-DHL

Siti Maemunah, Apsada Juhri, Mudjiarjo Mudjiarjo, Lira Agusinta, Yuliantini Yuliantini

Abstract


The aim of the research was to determine the priority carriers of the five most frequently used carriers by the company. This study uses the AHP-TOPSIS (Analytic Hierarchy Process – Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solutions) method and a Likert scale as a comparison. Problem solving, researchers used qualitative and quantitative research methodologies. Collecting data using interviews and questionnaires for AHP and Likert weighting, then secondary data on the company's achievement of carriers as the basis for TOPSIS data processing. The results of the comparison will be measured using the Hamming and Euclidean distance calculation methods. On the weighting of AHP into a Likert scale, Etihad results with a count of 15.37, followed by Qatar Air with a count of 12.71, then KLM Air with a count of 12.00, followed by Oman Air with a count of 11.29, then Emirates with a count of 10.64. The AHP-TOPSIS method obtained the results of Etihad with RC+ 0.64, followed by Qatar Air with RC+ 0.60, then Emirates with RC+ 0.51 value, followed by KLM Air with RC+ 0.46 value, then Oman Air with RC+ 0.45 value. The results show that Etihad came out as a priority carrier with the highest value at the truth degree of 83% Hamming distance and 0.80 Euclidean distance.

Keywords


Determination of Carrier Priority, Analytic Hierarchy Process

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ariyanti, S., Ismail, A., & Gunaryono, A. (2020). Penilaian Kinerja Supplier Material Busa menggunakan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Jurnal PASTI, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.22441/pasti.2020.v14i1.002

Arsalaan, A. S., Nguyen, H., Coyle, A., & Fida, M. (2021). Quality of information with minimum requirements for emergency communications. Ad Hoc Networks, 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2020.102331

Bag, S. (2018). Supplier Management and Sustainable Innovation in Supply Networks: An Empirical Study. Global Business Review, 19(3_suppl). https://doi.org/10.1177/097215091876005.

Basjir, Mochammad. 2011. Pengembangan Model Penentuan dan Rekomendasi Perbaikan terhadap Mode Kegagalan Komponen dengan Metodologi Fmea, Fuzzy dan Tosis yang terintegrasi. Tesis Pascasarjana Teknik Industri. Its Surabaya.

Cen, L., Chen, F., Hou, Y., & Richardson, G. D. (2018). Strategic disclosures of litigation loss contingencies when customer-supplier relationships are at risk. Accounting Review, 93(2). https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51869

DAS, S. K., Akarte, M., & Dutta, S. (2020). Prioritization of Success Factors to Sustain Buyer-Supplier Dyadic Relationship and its Impact on Business Performance. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1504/ijlsm. 2020.10015735

Firmansyah, M. A and Maemunah, S. 2021. Lean Management and Green Supply Chain Management Implementation on the Manufacturing and Logistics Industry at an Indonesia. Business and Entrepreneurial Review. Vol. 21, No.1 April 2021. Vol. 21, No.1 April 2021

Hald, K. S., & Ellegaard, C. (2011). Supplier evaluation processes: The shaping and reshaping of supplier performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 31(8). https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111153085

Handfield, R. B., Cousins, P. D., Lawson, B., & Petersen, K. J. (2015). How Can Supply Management Really Improve Performance? A Knowledge-Based Model of Alignment Capabilities. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12066

Karjalainen, K., & Moxham, C. (2013). Focus on Fairtrade: Propositions for Integrating Fairtrade and Supply Chain Management Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10551-012-1469-1

Maemunah, S., & Cuaca, H. (2021). Influence of epidemic COVID–19 on business strategy, information technology and supply chain agility to firm performance in medical device industry. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 661-669. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS1.1452

Maemunah, S., and Syakbani, B. 2021. Strategic Logistics on Halal Products. Valid Jurnal Ilmiah. Vol. 18 No. 2, Juli 2021, 128-135.

Nurjanah, N. (2020). Analisis Pemilihan Vendor Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Studi Kasus pada PT Bukit Asam Unit Tarahan. Jurnal Logistik Bisnis, 10(02). https://doi.org/10.46369/logistik.v10i02.951

Papathanasiou, J., & Ploskas, N. (2018). TOPSIS. In Springer Optimization and Its Applications (Vol. 136). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91648-4_1 PER-178_PJ_2006.pdf. (n.d.). PER-30_PJ_2018.pdf. (n.d.).

Ratnasari, K. C. K. R. T. (2017). Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia. In Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia.

Reis, V., & Macário, R. (2019). Intermodal freight transportation. In Intermodal Freight Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-01106-0 Reyublik, L. N. (2017). Lembaran Negara Reyublik. 223, 1–9.

Ricardianto, P., Martagani, M., Teweng, N. M., Maemunah, S., Kurniawan, J. S. 2021. Strategy to Increase Passenger Attractiveness at Kertajati International Airport, West Java. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science. Volume 9 ~ Issue 9 (2021)pp: 31-37

Tektas, A., & Aytekin, A. (2013). Supplier Selection in the International Environment: A Comparative Case of A Turkish and an Australian Company. IBIMA Business Review. https://doi.org/10.5171/2011.598845

Terpend, R., & Ashenbaum, B. (2012). The Intersection of Power, Trust and Supplier Network Size: Implications for Supplier Performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2011.03261.x

Tirkolaee, E. B., Dashtian, Z., Weber, G. W., Tomaskova, H., Soltani, M., & Mousavi, N. S. (2021). An integrated decision-making approach for green supplier selection in an agri-food supply chain: Threshold of robustness worthiness. Mathematics, 9(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9111304

Tjiptono, F., & Diana, A. (2016). Pemasaran Esensi dan Aplikasi. In Penerbit Andi.

Torlak, G., Sevkli, M., Sanal, M., & Zaim, S. (2011). Analyzing business competition by using fuzzy TOPSIS method: An example of Turkish domestic airline industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.125




DOI: https://doi.org/10.52186/aviasi.v19i1.93

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Siti Maemunah, Apsada Juhri, Mudjiarjo Mudhjiarjo, Lira Agusinta, Yuliantini Yuliantini

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

SEKOLAH TINGGI PENERBANGAN AVIASI
Jl. Outer Ringroad Lkr. Luar No.13, RT.13/RW.11, Cengkareng Tim., Kecamatan Cengkareng, Kota Jakarta Barat,
Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 11730
Phone : 0812-9511-7772/0812-7570-2020
Fax : 021 52395907

Creative Commons License
Aviasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Kedirgantaraan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.